halt vs halt -p
Jake Moilanen
moilanen at austin.ibm.com
Thu Feb 5 07:19:05 EST 2004
Maybe I don't know the history, but why do we power-off on a 'halt'?
According to the man page, we shouldn't power-off unless it's a 'halt
-p' or a 'poweroff'.
I checked x86 and it doesn't do anything on a halt. I put a patch below
of what I would have expected the code to look like.
Thanks,
Jake
diff -Nru a/arch/ppc64/kernel/iSeries_setup.c
b/arch/ppc64/kernel/iSeries_setup.c
--- a/arch/ppc64/kernel/iSeries_setup.c Wed Feb 4 13:37:46 2004
+++ b/arch/ppc64/kernel/iSeries_setup.c Wed Feb 4 13:37:46 2004
@@ -786,7 +786,6 @@
*/
void iSeries_halt(void)
{
- mf_powerOff();
}
/* JDH Hack */
diff -Nru a/arch/ppc64/kernel/rtas.c b/arch/ppc64/kernel/rtas.c
--- a/arch/ppc64/kernel/rtas.c Wed Feb 4 13:37:46 2004
+++ b/arch/ppc64/kernel/rtas.c Wed Feb 4 13:37:46 2004
@@ -417,7 +417,6 @@
{
if (rtas_firmware_flash_list.next)
rtas_flash_bypass_warning();
- rtas_power_off();
}
unsigned long rtas_rmo_buf = 0;
** Sent via the linuxppc64-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
More information about the Linuxppc64-dev
mailing list