LPARCFG

[David Boutcher]

owner-linuxppc64-dev at lists.linuxppc.org wrote on 01/31/2004 11:02:28 PM:
> Any reason we cant make lparcfg tristate (so we can compile it as a
> module?)
>
> Im keeping an eye on our kernel size (its getting huge), any chance
> we get to cut it down is worth it.

I think that's a great idea.  Especially since it has that stupid e2a
routine :-)  There are a couple of pieces of IBM software that want to find
/proc/lparcfg, but as long as they know they need to document the
dependency on the module, we should be fine.

Dave Boutcher
IBM Linux Technology Center


** Sent via the linuxppc64-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/