[Lse-tech] Re: [PATCH 2/4] 2.6.1-mm2: sched-domain

Nick Piggin piggin at cyberone.com.au
Sun Feb 1 21:24:40 EST 2004


Rick Lindsley wrote:

>    Do you have the SMT scheduler enabled? Maybe its a bug with SMT off or
>    maybe my box wasnt stable and I didnt notice :)
>
>Good point --  I've been running standard regression tests against it
>on x86 and seen nothing like this.  But I haven't enabled SMT.  I just
>finished going through the code with Martin and another engineer last
>week and am summarizing some thoughts, but there was no major fallovers
>like this.
>
>

SMT should be i386 only at this stage so it rules that out.

x86 is pretty stable, that I am sure of. I have run it on quite
a lot of boxes, SMP P4, NUMAQ, SMP P3s, UP, etc plus countless
people testing -mm.

It wouldn't surprise me if there is a problem with another
architecture... but then again as you say Anton is running it
OK so I dunno. Maybe it is a compiler bug?


** Sent via the linuxppc64-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/





More information about the Linuxppc64-dev mailing list