FDT bindings for I2C devices

Grant Likely grant.likely at secretlab.ca
Wed Oct 24 04:50:48 EST 2007

On 10/23/07, Scott Wood <scottwood at freescale.com> wrote:
> Grant Likely wrote:
> > Scott Wood made an attempt at defining a device binding for I2C
> > devices, but it has not been merged into booting-without-of.txt yet.
> > I've copied what he wrote below.  I would add to his definition the
> > following:
> > - If compatible is missing, driver should *not* fall back to the device name.
> > - 'compatible' list should include the exact device in the form "<mfg>,<part>"
> Those are good recommendations for any node, but I don't see why i2c in
> particular should mandate it.

I only mention it because the example given doesn't show that.


Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.
grant.likely at secretlab.ca
(403) 399-0195

More information about the Linuxppc-embedded mailing list