use of fsl, in lite5200b.dts in git current

[Grant Likely]

On 11/8/07, Jon Smirl <jonsmirl at gmail.com> wrote:
> No one has answered this yet. It makes no sense at all to mix use of
> the vendor prefix on some compatible entries and not on others. The
> syntax of compatible entries needs to be consistent.

The 5200 binding is poorly done on this point.  I've got a patch that
adds the 'fsl,' prefix so that future 5200 device trees are consistent
with the recommended practices (while not breaking older boards of
course)

g.

-- 
Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.
grant.likely at secretlab.ca
(403) 399-0195