ARCH=ppc or ARCH=powerpc

[Bhupender Saharan]

Hi,

All the new development is happening in arch/powerpc  architecure. So it is
good to use this architecure if you are upgrading the kernel. But it might
not work with kernel 1.1.2, As arch/powerpc need a structure like open
firmware for the parameters.


If you want to stick to 1.1.2 u-boot version then you shall use arch/ppc
architecure.

Regards
Bhupi


On 6/27/07, Bizhan Gholikhamseh (bgholikh) <bgholikh at cisco.com> wrote:
>
>  Hi All,
> Sorry for asking this question again, I am still not clear on some of the
> issues.
> Background:
> We have developed a custom board based on Freescale reference board:
> MPC8555_CDS with MPC8541E processor running Linux 2.6.11 and uboot 1.1.2version.
>
> I would like to update the Linux kernel to the latest available kernel
> 2.6.21.
> Here are my questions:
> 1- Should I use ARCH=ppc or ARCH=powerpc to build the kernel?
> 2- I have seen similar filenames under arch/ppc and arch/powerpc, which
> one applies to MPC8541E?
> 3- Once I build the kernel, could I load the kernel with uboot version
> 1.1.2 or not? if not what I should do?
>
> Many thanks in advance,
> Bizhan
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-embedded mailing list
> Linuxppc-embedded at ozlabs.org
> https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-embedded/attachments/20070627/51435cbd/attachment.htm