[PATCH] Add USB support to mpc8349-mitx board port

John Rigby jcrigby at gmail.com
Tue Jul 10 09:35:58 EST 2007

I'm just saying that an argument can be made that having all the OF to
glue in one place is better than having dual bindings in every driver.

If you count ugliness in terms of file count the fsl_soc.c solution
gets a score of 1 and the dual binding solution gets an score of N.
Where N is the number of drivers.


On 7/9/07, Grant Likely <grant.likely at secretlab.ca> wrote:
> On 7/8/07, John Rigby <jcrigby at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I see your point, I agree the two layers of glue is bad.  But this means
> > the double code is spread across many drivers instead of being in one
> > place (fsl_soc.c).
> ???  I don't understand what you mean.  Are you saying that it's
> better to have all the OF bindings in one place (fsl_soc.c) instead of
> with each individual driver?
> Cheers,
> g.
> --
> Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng.
> Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.
> grant.likely at secretlab.ca
> (403) 399-0195
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-embedded/attachments/20070709/99c6cef6/attachment.htm 

More information about the Linuxppc-embedded mailing list