In: Re: System Ace booting (or not) question

linux-ppc at linux-ppc at
Tue Jan 23 21:45:12 EST 2007

linux-ppc linux-ppc/eurotel
Sent by: Massimiliano Patriarca
23/01/2007 10.42

"Wade Maxfield" <wmaxfield at>

Re: System Ace booting (or not) question

Hi Wade,
we made our board from scratch, there are two FPGA, one FX12 and one SX35, 
loaded with system ace,Montavista Linux and everything is ok.
Is the JTAG chain in the correct sequence?
are there in your board only one fpga or there is a chain with two fpga? 
if yes the Xilinx documentation with genace.tcl fails to concatenate two 
fpga files.
also verify the tools errors manually executing the genace.tcl commands; 
they are not so difficult to understand.
also verify that bootlloop code is loaded into the fabric ram.
keep in mind that your memory is to be loaded via JTAG command, so if FPGA 
load correctly and DDR is working, then there is no reason to have DDR 
load failure.

"Wade Maxfield" <wmaxfield at> 
Sent by: at
05/01/2007 17.23

christophe.alayrac at
ppc <linuxppc-embedded at>
Re: System Ace booting (or not) question

Hi Alayrac,

  Thank you for your reply.

  No, there is no bus error.

  The memory map of our design matches the ML403 as regards the DDR ram. 
We are just trying to get the code into external DDR Ram.

  The code start address is specified in the elf file, and lists correctly 
on the screen as the genace script executes.

  The code in zImage.elf is compiled to the DDR space, and so should load 
there.   The genace script prints out the code will load there when it 
runs and places 
the .elf file into the system.  The system.ace file is 10 megabytes after 
the zImage.elf code is put into it.  when doing only the internal block 
ram load, the system.ace
file is only 2.8 megabytes in size.

thanks again,

On 1/5/07, alayrac christophe <christophe.alayrac at > wrote:
High Wade,

Does systemace comes out with a bus error? (Red led on ML403 board)? 

If yes may be its because the memory map of your design did not fit with
ML403 ones and that SystemaAce try to load kernel image in a non ram

you may have to specify the code start address to the genace.tcl script
to generate properly the ace file. (it should be something like
start_address 0xYOURADDR in the opt file)

Have you tried to download the kernel image through JTAG?

You can also try to compile a standalone code in DDR space (not BRAM as 
describe in your email) an try to make an ace file with it.



Le vendredi 05 janvier 2007 à 09:20 -0600, Wade Maxfield a écrit :
>   I'm very new to System Ace, and this is probably a stupid question. 
>   We were able, with the Monta Vista Linux to get a system.ace with a
> zImage.elf linux file to boot on an ml403 board.  The system ace chip
> seemed to copy the zImage.elf into DDR ram, and the system booted.  No 
> block ram used.
>    We created a board with an xf60 and a system ace chip on it and
> created a system.ace file.  The xilinx loads, but the zImage.elf does
> not copy into ddr ram.  We ran the testfatfs code and read from and 
> wrote to the compact flash on the system ace chip, verifying the files
> through a compact flash adaptor on a pc.
>    We created a memory test using the ppc and were able (after some
> wiring changes and other headaches) to prove the ddr ram works.  There 
> is enough of it to support linux (64 meg), and testing all 64 million
> locations with various fixed and incrementing patterns proves it
> works.
>    However, we could not get the external ram to load up with the 
> linux zImage.elf file. When this failed, we created a system.ace file
> with two elf's in it, one for linux, one for a memory read/write
> tester in block ram.
>   It appears the system ace chip loads the info into block ram just 
> fine, and our memory test executes.  However, our ddr ram has nothing
> in it.  We reversed the order of the elf files, and that still did not
> help.
>   Do we need a helper CPLD on this board to accomplish what the ML403 
> accomplishes?  Or do we need to do a boot loader in code?  If we need
> to do a boot loader, how come the Monta Vista linux doesn't need one
> on the ml403 board?  I've been googling and scouring the Xilinx site, 
> but I've achieved nothing but a few less hairs on my head.
>   I've already asked Monta Vista this question, and they quoted
> verbatim the page from the xilinx manual, which is a generic answer to 
> the specific question.  Even if the xilinx manual is the answer, we
> aren't seeing the results the manual implies we will see.
>   Can someone give me a clue?
> thanks,
> wade 
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-embedded mailing list
> Linuxppc-embedded at

Linuxppc-embedded mailing list
Linuxppc-embedded at
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...

More information about the Linuxppc-embedded mailing list