enabling two eths
Manjunath AM
Manjunath.AM at Lntemsys.com
Thu Feb 22 15:24:21 EST 2007
Hi Martin,
Thanks for your reply,Yes I tried swapping the assignments,same thing is
happening in both cases..ifconfig and route -n results are as below:
ifconfig
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:99:23:C4:AD:DE
inet addr:192.168.33.64 Bcast:192.168.33.255 Mask:255.255.248.0
inet6 addr: fe80::299:23ff:fec4:adde/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:308 (308.0 b)
Base address:0x8400
eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:99:23:44:AD:DE
inet addr:192.168.178.124 Bcast:192.168.178.255
Mask:255.255.255.0
inet6 addr: fe80::299:23ff:fe44:adde/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:22790 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:9218 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:8830
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:14916045 (14.2 MiB) TX bytes:1463093 (1.3 MiB)
Base address:0x8500
lo Link encap:Local Loopback
inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host
UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b)
route -n
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use
Iface
192.168.178.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0
eth1
192.168.32.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.248.0 U 0 0 0
eth0
0.0.0.0 192.168.178.47 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0
eth1
Thanks & Regards
MANJUNATH AM
Senior Software Engineer
Emsys
Larsen & Toubro Limited
Mysore-570018
Mobile:9886375926
"Leisner, Martin" <Martin.Leisner at xerox.com>
Sent by: linuxppc-embedded-bounces+manjunath.am=lntemsys.com at ozlabs.org
02/21/2007 09:58 PM
To
"Manjunath AM" <Manjunath.AM at Lntemsys.com>, "Vitaly Bordug"
<vbordug at ru.mvista.com>
cc
linuxppc-embedded at ozlabs.org
Subject
RE: enabling two eths
Send the results of
ifconfig
and
route -n
I take it eth0 works fine...
Have you tried swapping the assignments and see if eth1 works (to
eliminate faulty hardware).
marty
From: linuxppc-embedded-bounces+martin.leisner=xerox.com at ozlabs.org
[mailto:linuxppc-embedded-bounces+martin.leisner=xerox.com at ozlabs.org] On
Behalf Of Manjunath AM
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 11:50 PM
To: Vitaly Bordug
Cc: linuxppc-embedded at ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: enabling two eths
Hi, Thanks for your kind reply, Yes i have used different * IP Subnets*
The IPs and subnet details I use is
1. eth0(configured through u-boot env settings)->> 192.168.174.231 and
subnet is 255.255.255.0
2. eth1(configured after kernel is up)--> 192.168.33.64 and subnet is
255.255.248.0
Even i tried by connecting second eth to host PC using cross cable as a
stand-alone network but even "ping" did not work..
Thanks & Regards
MANJUNATH AM
Senior Software Engineer
Emsys
Larsen & Toubro Limited
Mysore-570018
Mobile:9886375926
Vitaly Bordug <vbordug at ru.mvista.com>
02/20/2007 09:30 PM
To
Alex Zeffertt <ajz at cambridgebroadband.com>
cc
Manjunath AM <Manjunath.AM at Lntemsys.com>, linuxppc-embedded at ozlabs.org
Subject
Re: enabling two eths
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 15:31:54 +0000
Alex Zeffertt <ajz at cambridgebroadband.com> wrote:
>
> Manjunath AM wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > We are using MPC8272 based target board, we use montavista Linux
version
> > 2.6.10 kernel image (with NFS enabled) to our target board,
> >
> > Our board has 2 FCCs (eth0 and eth1). bot the eth's works perfectly
> > when we use them independently, but when we are trying to enable
second
> > one after the kernel is up using linux command "ifconfig eth1
> > 192.168.33.64 up"(IP address)nothing is working.
> > Please suggest how to enable second eth (either 0 or 1) once the
kernel
> > is up with NFS file system
>
>
> Have you made sure that eth0 and eth1 are on *different* IP subnets?
> If they are on the same subnet, or intersecting subnets, your routing
> will get confused.
>
It depends :)
I used to test functionality such a way to have two enets in same subnet,
then ifdown one of them.
At least with mvista RFS, one enet handles NFS, other is up but all the
packets are routed to it via
the first one. And when the first one got ifdown, routing switches to the
remaining enet...
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-embedded mailing list
Linuxppc-embedded at ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-embedded/attachments/20070222/c0b24974/attachment.htm
More information about the Linuxppc-embedded
mailing list