mcpu options for AMCC440 with fpu
Magnus Hjorth
mh at omnisys.se
Thu Feb 22 08:35:43 EST 2007
Hi,
Have you tried using the -ffast-math option?
/Magnus
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 20:47:50 +0100
Patrice Bouchand <pb_fwd_list at yahoo.fr> wrote:
>
> FYI, I got the following answer on mplayer mailing list:
>
> > Apparently -mcpu=440fp is the one. However, it's possible, that GCC
> > "optimizations" actually make the code slower.
>
> Can someone confirme this possiblity ?
>
> Any answer would be greatly appreciated ;)
>
>
> Patrice Bouchand
>
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I was searching for the best mcpu option for amcc440, compiling and
> > running a small program you can find here:
> > http://magnux.free.fr/gcc/mandelbrot.c. My distro is a ppc fedora core
> > 6, and results are obviously the same using DENX4.0.
> >
> > --------------------
> > -bash-3.00# gcc -O2 ./mandelbrot.c -o ./mandelbrot &&
> > time ./mandelbrot && rm -f ./mandelbrot
> >
> > real 1m15.059s
> > user 1m14.996s
> > sys 0m0.060s
> > -bash-3.00# gcc -O2 -mcpu=440 ./mandelbrot.c -o ./mandelbrot &&
> > time ./mandelbrot && rm -f ./mandelbrot
> >
> > real 0m39.606s
> > user 0m39.552s
> > sys 0m0.028s
> > -bash-3.00# gcc -O2 -mcpu=440fp ./mandelbrot.c -o ./mandelbrot &&
> > time ./mandelbrot && rm -f ./mandelbrot
> >
> > real 1m15.016s
> > user 1m14.988s
> > sys 0m0.024s
> > -bash-3.00# gcc -O2 -msoft-float ./mandelbrot.c -o ./mandelbrot &&
> > time ./mandelbrot && rm -f ./mandelbrot
> >
> > real 0m39.577s
> > user 0m39.544s
> > sys 0m0.032s
> > --------------------
> >
> > * I do not explain why not using FPU gives better results ?
> >
> > * I did also a test with bzip2.c
> > ( http://pag.csail.mit.edu/~smcc/projects/single-file-programs/bzip2.c ).
> >
> > ----------------------
> > -bash-3.00# gcc -O2 ./bzip2.c -o ./bzip2 && time ./bzip2 ./oggenc.c
> > && ./bzip2 -d ./oggenc.c.bz2 && rm ./bzip2
> >
> > real 0m18.478s
> > user 0m18.216s
> > sys 0m0.152s
> > -bash-3.00# gcc -O2 -mcpu=440 ./bzip2.c -o ./bzip2 &&
> > time ./bzip2 ./oggenc.c && ./bzip2 -d ./oggenc.c.bz2 && rm ./bzip2
> >
> > real 0m18.786s
> > user 0m18.544s
> > sys 0m0.128s
> > -bash-3.00# gcc -O2 -mcpu=440fp ./bzip2.c -o ./bzip2 &&
> > time ./bzip2 ./oggenc.c && ./bzip2 -d ./oggenc.c.bz2 && rm ./bzip2
> >
> > real 0m18.811s
> > user 0m18.548s
> > sys 0m0.144s
> > -bash-3.00# gcc -O2 -mcpu=G3 ./bzip2.c -o ./bzip2 &&
> > time ./bzip2 ./oggenc.c && ./bzip2 -d ./oggenc.c.bz2 && rm ./bzip2
> >
> > real 0m18.871s
> > user 0m18.644s
> > sys 0m0.104s
> > ----------------------
> >
> > * mcpu option seems to not have any effect ?
> >
> > * My third test was to compile and run mplayer.
> > - With default options (no mcpu specified), my test mpeg was smooth.
> > - With mcpu=440fp, my test mpeg was not smooth.
> >
> > Can anybody bring me some lights about the right gcc mcpu option for
> > amcc440 ?
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Patrice Bouchand
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ______________________________________________________________________
> > Découvrez une nouvelle façon d'obtenir des réponses à toutes vos
> > questions ! Profitez des connaissances, des opinions et des
> > expériences des internautes sur Yahoo! Questions/Réponses.
> > _______________________________________________
> > Linuxppc-embedded mailing list
> > Linuxppc-embedded at ozlabs.org
> > https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-embedded mailing list
> Linuxppc-embedded at ozlabs.org
> https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded
More information about the Linuxppc-embedded
mailing list