[PATCH] ppc: Add support for AMCC Taishan 440GX eval board
David Gibson
david at gibson.dropbear.id.au
Tue Feb 13 11:46:08 EST 2007
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 02:41:36PM -0600, Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> On Feb 12, 2007, at 2:23 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2007-02-12 at 14:16 -0600, Jon Loeliger wrote:
> >> So, like, the other day Benjamin Herrenschmidt mumbled:
> >>>
> >>> Note that there are still things that we might want to change. For
> >>> example, I think we really should look into adding a macro mecanism
> >>> and/or an include mecanism to dtc so that we can do things like
> >>> #include
> >>> <ibm440gp.dtc> to get the base processor/SoC definition and then
> >>> "overlay" some properties on top of it (like emac phy mode etc...)
> >>
> >> What do people prefer here? Straight CPP pre-run?
> >
> > CPP pre-run has issue, notably due to the usage of "#" in property
> > names.
>
> You can get around that by invoking cpp with the right flags, I
> looked at doing this a while back and had it working.
Umm.. which flags?
> >> Direct support built into dtc to do file-inclusion, macros?
> >
> > We aren't sure yet, though David might have ideas.
>
> Would be nice for simple math as well (addition, subtraction, bitwise
> ops, and shifts). For example was thinking that having some macro's
> around the PCI dev node's would make it a bit more readable to mere
> mortals.
Yes. Adding an expression model would be more complex though.
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
More information about the Linuxppc-embedded
mailing list