Setting I&D cache enable in the same mtspr instruction
Mark A. Greer
mgreer at mvista.com
Tue May 16 04:59:51 EST 2006
On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 01:39:13PM +0300, Assaf Hoffman wrote:
> Hi,
> I think the implementation of setup_common_caches() in file
> cpu_setup_6xx.S; not according to the spec as far as MPC74xx concerns.
> Looking in the spec (MPC7450 RISC Microprocessor Family Reference
> Manual, MPC7450UM Rev. 5 1/2005) section 3.4.1.5 L1 Instruction and Data
> Cache Flash Invalidation it says:
> "Note that HID0[ICFI] and HID0[DCFI] must not both be set with the same
> mtspr instruction, due to the synchronization requirements described in
> Section 2.4.2.4.1, "Context Synchronization."
> But in the code those two do set together.
> Also, the same section says:
> "An isync must precede the setting of the HID0[ICFI] in order for the
> setting to take effect."
> But in the code, only 'sync' can be found.
>
> /* Enable caches for 603's, 604, 750 & 7400 */
> setup_common_caches:
> mfspr r11,SPRN_HID0
> andi. r0,r11,HID0_DCE
> ori r11,r11,HID0_ICE|HID0_DCE
> ori r8,r11,HID0_ICFI
> bne 1f /* don't invalidate the D-cache
> */
> ori r8,r8,HID0_DCI /* unless it wasn't enabled */
> 1: sync
> mtspr SPRN_HID0,r8 /* enable and invalidate caches
> */
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Here we set both ICFI and DCFI in the same
> mtspr instruction. Also, no isync before setting ICFI.
> sync
> mtspr SPRN_HID0,r11 /* enable caches */
> sync
> isync
> blr
>
> Please advice.
> Thanks.
Yep, looks like a bug. How about a patch? :)
Mark
More information about the Linuxppc-embedded
mailing list