fs_enet on 2.4 and 8xx_immap

[Vitaly Bordug]

On Tue, 07 Mar 2006 15:37:16 GMT
"antonio.dibacco" <antonio.dibacco at aruba.it> wrote:

> I think I will use the 8xx_immap.h borrowed from u-boot-1.1.4, it is really 
> similar to that of 2.4.25, with some explicit padding and fec2. Do you think 
> that porting fs_enet to 2.4 is it the best way to have both FECs working on 
> a MPC875? I don't want to use 2.6.
> 
Sounds reasonable, but I'll repeat:
fs_enet patches for 2.6 used to support 2.4 thing(via #ifdef's), it was cleaned up close to submission. IIRC, it handles 2 fecs quite great on my 885ads, so it worths to search around a bit before hacking...

> Bye,
> Antonio. 
> 
> Vitaly Bordug Scrive: 
> 
> > On Tue, 07 Mar 2006 13:15:00 GMT
> > "antonio.dibacco" <antonio.dibacco at aruba.it> wrote: 
> > 
> >> I think that to make it work I need to update cpm8xx_t inserting the fec2 
> >> filed. Is this true? Could I use the 8xx_immap.h of a 2.6 kernel? 
> >> 
> > Not exactly. I think you can borrow the structures from 2.6, but do a triple-check that the result offsets are the same. 
> > 
> >> Bye,
> >> Antonio.
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Linuxppc-embedded mailing list
> >> Linuxppc-embedded at ozlabs.org
> >> https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded 
> >> 
> >> 
> >  
> > 
> > -- 
> > Sincerely, 
> > Vitaly
>  
> 
> 


-- 
Sincerely, 
Vitaly