[PATCH] ppc32: fix cpm_uart_int() missing interrupts
Dan Malek
dan at embeddededge.com
Fri May 20 06:32:37 EST 2005
On May 19, 2005, at 4:26 PM, Guillaume Autran wrote:
> You are right, moving the event clearing statement is much easier and
> cleaner. Let the interrupt be the loop.
I also just had the thought we could check the events for non-zero,
clear them, and process only the ones we wanted. That would save
the interrupt overhead if we had high speed ports (which I really
don't like for normal RS-232 anyway :-)).
I'll move this patch ahead.
Thanks.
-- Dan
More information about the Linuxppc-embedded
mailing list