still not clear on which tree to be using these days

[Robert P. J. Day]

On Fri, 25 Mar 2005, Dan Malek wrote:

>
> On Mar 25, 2005, at 4:19 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> >   what is the proper tree to be using these days for a 2.6 kernel
> > on 8xx?  for the longest time, i've used the "bk" checkout from
> > bkbits.net, but i see others now working with what looks like the
> > latest stock 2.6.x release.
>
> I just use the latest kernel.org tree for everything.  If I'm
> submitting a patch, or working with someone else, I use the bk tree
> just to be that little more up to date.

i just downloaded the 2.6.11-5 kernel source and was a bit nonplussed
to discover that "8xx" wasn't in the list of choices for processor,
until i noticed in the Kconfig file that 8xx depends on "BROKEN".  oh,
my. :-)  live and learn.

rday