CPM2 vs PQ2: The Naming Issue

[Jason McMullan]

I think the issue with naming is that there are people that consider the
'part name' to be CPM2 (the macrocell), and other consider the 
'part name' to be the whole SoC.

Both are valid concepts, I just tend to go towards the macrocell
side of the fence.

If we consider the CPM2 to be a 'part' that dispenses other 'parts',
we could actually consider the CPM2 to be a bus-type object.

Hmm. I kinda like that, actually. (But then, I'm a crazy nutball)

-- 
Jason McMullan <jason.mcmullan at gmail.com>
"Sure, send me the latest Knoppix DVD as an attachment..."
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-embedded/attachments/20050615/b435290f/attachment.pgp