RFC: cpm2_devices.c

[Kumar Gala]

On Jun 15, 2005, at 9:33 AM, Jason McMullan wrote:

> On Wed, 2005-06-15 at 09:25 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>> Yes, I removed the fcc_regs_c since its not always true.  Please don't
>> rename the file to cpm2_.  I think I'm going to end up renaming them 
>> to
>> pq2_ since that is the most appropriate name.  I'd say we are about 
>> 80%
>
>  PQ2_? But all these devices are on PQ3 also!

Sure and they are in the mpc85xx_* files.  Maybe I'm missing some 
concern people have here.  It dont see what the issue is.  This is just 
like how TSEC/gianfar show up in both mpc85xx_* and mpc83xx_*.  These 
files are intended to represent the devices found on a product family 
(PQ2, PQ3, PQ2 Pro, etc.).  There is going to be overlap.

Also, its not 100% true that all of the devices on a PQ2 exist in PQ3.  
For example (and this isn't a great one) the security block on 
8248/8272 is different than the security block on PQ3 devices.

- kumar