Réf. : Re: starting RAM adress for linux kernel
Wolfgang Denk
wd at denx.de
Sat Jun 4 01:58:49 EST 2005
Dear Sphie,
in message <OFF1C6B550.9120AF42-ONC1257015.004EFCD3 at brime.fr> you wrote:
>
> we need to have the start of Ram at 0x0300 0000 because we use the command
> mem=40M (for uboot) to force Linux
> in the low part of memory and to reserve the high part of memory (218M
> exactly ) for ioremap (for our application) but we keep
I don't see any reason why this would prevent you from mapping the
RAM at physical address 0.
> the same flash mapping (to avoid more problems).
I don't know which problems you want to avoid by your chosen memory
map, but I guess that the problems you *cause* by this choice are
more, and more severe.
> Is the only solution is to inverse the mapping with Ram from 0 to 258M and
> the flash above ?
Yes.
> Finally, will Busybox work with Ram starting at 0x03000000 ?
No, it will not, as BB is application code which requires a running
kernel, and your kernel will not run with such a mapping.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
Software Engineering: Embedded and Realtime Systems, Embedded Linux
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
"It may be that our role on this planet is not to worship God but to
create him." - Arthur C. Clarke
More information about the Linuxppc-embedded
mailing list