bd_t Cleaning: Board Changes

[Kumar Gala]

Well, as 85xx/83xx maintainer I'm ok with it.  We should probably need 
4xx (Matt) and 8xx/82xx (Dan/Tom) agreement.

- kumar

On Jun 1, 2005, at 1:10 PM, Mark A. Greer wrote:

> Jon Loeliger wrote:
>
>> <snip>
>>
>> Part Two of Four, the Board Changes.
>>
>> ppc/platforms/4xx/ash.h                 |   21 -
>> ppc/platforms/4xx/bubinga.c             |    4
>> ppc/platforms/4xx/bubinga.h             |   23 -
>> ppc/platforms/4xx/cpci405.h             |    2
>> ppc/platforms/4xx/ebony.c               |    9
>> ppc/platforms/4xx/ep405.c               |   12
>> ppc/platforms/4xx/ep405.h               |   13
>> ppc/platforms/4xx/luan.c                |    7
>> ppc/platforms/4xx/oak.c                 |   15
>> ppc/platforms/4xx/oak.h                 |   19 -
>> ppc/platforms/4xx/oak_setup.h           |    2
>> ppc/platforms/4xx/ocotea.c              |   13
>> ppc/platforms/4xx/redwood5.h            |   13
>> ppc/platforms/4xx/redwood6.c            |   27 -
>> ppc/platforms/4xx/redwood6.h            |   13
>> ppc/platforms/4xx/sycamore.h            |   22 -
>> ppc/platforms/4xx/walnut.h              |   22 -
>> ppc/platforms/4xx/xilinx_ml300.h        |   12
>> ppc/platforms/83xx/mpc834x_sys.c        |   49 +-
>> ppc/platforms/83xx/mpc834x_sys.h        |    1
>> ppc/platforms/85xx/mpc8540_ads.c        |   57 ++-
>> ppc/platforms/85xx/mpc8560_ads.c        |   21 -
>> ppc/platforms/85xx/mpc85xx_ads_common.c |   10
>> ppc/platforms/85xx/mpc85xx_ads_common.h |    1
>> ppc/platforms/85xx/mpc85xx_cds_common.c |   48 +-
>> ppc/platforms/85xx/mpc85xx_cds_common.h |    1
>> ppc/platforms/85xx/sbc8560.c            |   19 -
>> ppc/platforms/85xx/sbc85xx.c            |   14
>> ppc/platforms/85xx/sbc85xx.h            |    1
>> ppc/platforms/85xx/stx_gp3.c            |   34 -
>> ppc/platforms/85xx/stx_gp3.h            |    1
>> ppc/platforms/bseip.h                   |   13
>> ppc/platforms/ccm.h                     |    2
>> ppc/platforms/cpci690.h                 |   10
>> ppc/platforms/est8260.h                 |   18
>> ppc/platforms/fads.h                    |    2
>> ppc/platforms/hdpu.c                    |   13
>> ppc/platforms/hermes.h                  |    2
>> ppc/platforms/ip860.h                   |    2
>> ppc/platforms/ivms8.h                   |    2
>> ppc/platforms/katana.c                  |    6
>> ppc/platforms/lantec.h                  |    2
>> ppc/platforms/lite5200.c                |    9
>> ppc/platforms/lwmon.h                   |    2
>> ppc/platforms/mbx.h                     |   22 -
>> ppc/platforms/pcu_e.h                   |    2
>> ppc/platforms/pq2ads.c                  |    1
>> ppc/platforms/pq2ads.h                  |    2
>> ppc/platforms/radstone_ppc7d.c          |   32 -
>> ppc/platforms/radstone_ppc7d.h          |    2
>> ppc/platforms/rpx8260.h                 |   19 -
>> ppc/platforms/rpxclassic.h              |   13
>> ppc/platforms/rpxlite.h                 |   13
>> ppc/platforms/sandpoint.c               |   11
>> ppc/platforms/sandpoint.h               |    2
>> ppc/platforms/sbc82xx.c                 |    6
>> ppc/platforms/sbc82xx.h                 |    2
>> ppc/platforms/sbs8260.h                 |   18
>> ppc/platforms/spd8xx.h                  |    2
>> ppc/platforms/tqm8260.h                 |    2
>> ppc/platforms/tqm8260_setup.c           |    1
>> ppc/platforms/tqm8xx.h                  |    2
>>
>>
>>
> <snip>
>
> All,
>
> So is this patch going to go in?  I haven't seen anyone "push it up".
> The reason I'm asking is that I have a couple patches that I would like
> to push up but they will collide with this one so I need to know if it
> (or a variation thereof) is going to go in or not.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mark
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-embedded mailing list
> Linuxppc-embedded at ozlabs.org
> https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded