Some issues with kernel 2.6 for MPC8260 target
Steven Blakeslee
BlakesleeS at embeddedplanet.com
Thu Jan 13 01:34:21 EST 2005
I ported it to the Embedded Planet ep8260 board with FCC3, ep8248 board
with FCC1 and FCC2 and ep8280 with FCC2 and FCC3. I had to make very
little, if anything, to get it to work. I did not try 2.6.9. I am
currently using 2.6.10-rc3 which I believe after the last merge is now
2.6.10. I did practically nothing to get all of these to work.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Saso Kavcic [mailto:saso at activetools.si]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2005 9:27 AM
> To: Steven Blakeslee
> Cc: linuxppc-embedded at ozlabs.org
> Subject: Re: Some issues with kernel 2.6 for MPC8260 target
>
> Hi Steven,
>
> Have you noticed any improvements in 2.6.10. over 2.6.9? We
> were porting
> 2.6.9 to a custom mpc8275vr
> board and we were able to get everything working except
> ethernet (fcc enet). We did manage to get a few packets over
> it but it was all very slow, unstable and unpredictable and
> it seemed that fcc enet driver doesn't work well in 2.6. Were
> you able to use fcc under 2.6.9?
>
> Best Regards, Saso
>
> Steven Blakeslee wrote:
>
> >I would suggest going to the latest 2.6.10 kernel. I have
> it running
> >with several ethernets running on all the 82xx processors.
> >
> >
> >
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: linuxppc-embedded-bounces at ozlabs.org
> >>[mailto:linuxppc-embedded-bounces at ozlabs.org] On Behalf Of Vijay
> >>Padiyar
> >>Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2005 5:37 AM
> >>To: LinuxPPC Support
> >>Subject: Some issues with kernel 2.6 for MPC8260 target
> >>
> >>Hi all
> >>
> >>I wish to discuss some strange issues that I faced with
> respect to the
> >>Linux
> >>2.6.8 kernel (downloaded from kernel.org). Firstly, I wish to know
> >>whether this has been known to work on an MPC8260 PowerPC target.
> >>
> >>Secondly, when I tried to compile the Linux kernel with my
> toolchain
> >>(built with Dan Kegel's crosstool for the PowerPC 603e
> core, which is
> >>what my processor has), I got some errors which I found to rather
> >>queer after investigation. Firstly, let me state the errors that I
> >>got:
> >>
> >>------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >> LD init/built-in.o
> >> LD .tmp_vmlinux1
> >>arch/ppc/8260_io/built-in.o(.text+0x103c): In function
> >>`mii_queue_relink':
> >>arch/ppc/8260_io/fcc_enet.c:1254: undefined reference to
> >>`schedule_task'
> >>arch/ppc/8260_io/built-in.o(.text+0x1074): In function
> >>`mii_queue_config':
> >>arch/ppc/8260_io/fcc_enet.c:1263: undefined reference to
> >>`schedule_task'
> >>
> >>------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >>On further investigation, I find that 'schedule_task()' is
> simply not
> >>defined anywhere in the 2.6.8 kernel sources. This is quite wierd!
> >>However, it is defined in a file 'context.c'
> >>(linux-src/kernel) in the 2.4.27 kernel sources, which we
> were using
> >>earlier. How is it that a function is being called but its
> definition
> >>has been removed from the sources?
> >>
> >>Another such example is with the structure 'tq_struct'. It
> is referred
> >>to in the file 'fcc_enet.c'
> >>(linux-src/arch/ppc/8260_io) but it's not defined anywhere!
> >>Again, after checking in the 2.4.27 sources, I find that
> it's defined
> >>in the file 'tqueue.h' (linux-src/include/linux)!
> >>
> >>A third thing is that the 2.4.27 kernel source file 'uart.c'
> >>(linux-src/arch/ppc/cpm2_io) is not present in the corresponding
> >>folder in the 2.6.8 source (linux-src/arch/ppc/8260_io).
> There is one
> >>'uart.c' in the folder '8xx_io', but it doesn't get compiled during
> >>the kernel build process. Will my UART work correctly with
> this build?
> >>
> >>Can someone please tell me if there's some explanation for
> this that
> >>I'm unaware of? Which would be the proper forum to report
> this? Again
> >>I would like to ask: Has the 2.6.8 kernel been tested
> successfully on
> >>the MPC8260 PowerPC platform?
> >>
> >>Lastly, where can I get the latest stable Linux kernel
> source for the
> >>PowerPC platform?
> >>
> >>Regards
> >>
> >>Vijay Padiyar
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>Linuxppc-embedded mailing list
> >>Linuxppc-embedded at ozlabs.org
> >>https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >_______________________________________________
> >Linuxppc-embedded mailing list
> >Linuxppc-embedded at ozlabs.org
> >https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded
> >
> >
>
>
More information about the Linuxppc-embedded
mailing list