Is linux-2.5-ocp the current 2.6 4xx code base

[Matt Porter]

On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 09:11:48AM -0700, Eugene Surovegin wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 01:02:21AM -0700, Lawrence E. Bakst wrote:
> > At 4:23 PM -0700 5/14/04, Matt Porter wrote:
> > >There is a tree, bk://source.mvista.com/linux-2.5-ocp, that has most
> > >4xx boards working, but it's 2.6.5.  The core 4xx support is moving into
> > >current 2.6, but it will be a little bit longer until important drivers
> > >like EMAC and IIC are merged into the stock kernel.
> > 
> > Is the linux-2.5-ocp tree still the right place to get 2.6 4xx code or has that code been moved upstream or someplace else?
> 
> Linux-2.5-ocp is obsolete.
> 
> > To be more specific which tree to a "bk clone" to get the latest stuff for 4xx.
> 
> Use kernel.org's BK tree: bk://linux.bkbits.net/linux-2.5

Oh my, I really should have killed off the old tree.

-- 
Matt Porter
mporter at kernel.crashing.org