bi_recs
Kumar Gala
kumar.gala at freescale.com
Fri Oct 1 13:11:03 EST 2004
> > But on the other hand, I've given up a long time ago trying to
> enforce any
> > kind of sane model on ppc32 because the embedded folks only care
> about having
> > a quick ugly broken hack to work with their board, thus the
> explosion of
> > various incompatible boot_info structures that we have nowadays.
>
> Yes indeed. It's ugly and needs fixing so I'll take a look at it - I
> just don't want to do this if everyone here already knows of a better
> solution which will work.
>
> Then Xilinx et al can generate memory maps and we can head towards
> having a single kernel binary bootable on multiple different ppc
> boards.
I would be nice to have an extensive and dynamic way to pass info from
the bootloader to the kernel. I believe that Wolfgang has stated he
would be willing to change u-boot to match. I'd be willing to fixup
and move Freescale boards over to use something as long as we get
u-boot to support it as well.
I've been told that ARM has a solution, in place, to this problem that
might always be worth looking at.
- kumar
More information about the Linuxppc-embedded
mailing list