Relationship between bk libuxppc-2.4 and denx linuxppc_2_4_devel

[Wolfgang Denk]

In message <Pine.GSO.4.53.0406111437580.9184 at solaris.xmission.com> you wrote:
>
> Unless I made some mistake in cloning the linuxppc-2.{4,5} trees from
> ppc.bkbits.net, (which is entirely possible as I'm a BK newbie), there
> appears to be a fair amount of processor- and platform-specific stuff
> in the Denx linuxppc_2_4_devel CVS tree which does not appear in the
> ppc.bkbits.net BK trees (e.g. arch/ppc/5xxx_io/... ).

Your finding is correct.

> Is the Denx CVS tree "authoritative" with regard to those extras?  Is

No, not at all. It's just what we're doing here at DENX.

> there any expectation that those bits found only in the Denx CVS tree
> will eventually find their way into the ppc.bkbits.net tree(s)?  (Or
> some other, more appropriate tree(s)?  If so, which?)

I gave up submitting patches - probably my communication  skills  are
inadequate.


Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

--
Software Engineering:  Embedded and Realtime Systems,  Embedded Linux
Phone: (+49)-8142-4596-87  Fax: (+49)-8142-4596-88  Email: wd at denx.de
Testing can show the presense of bugs, but not their absence.
                                                   -- Edsger Dijkstra

** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/