2.4 versus 2.6 patches

[Mark Chambers]

> If 2.4 works already for you, by all means use it -- but if you're doing
> any new development, or you _really_ want people to care when you find
> bugs, it really ought to be 2.6.
>

Well, this is a surprise to me.  Does the stock 2.6 even compile on 8xx yet,
or are you talking about 8xxx and/or IBM?

Mark Chambers


** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/