Problems w/ CONFIG_BLK_DEV_MPC8xx_IDE

Tom Rini trini at kernel.crashing.org
Tue Sep 16 01:16:48 EST 2003


On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 02:29:05PM +0200, Steven Scholz wrote:

> Hubert Figuiere wrote:
> >On Mon, 2003-09-15 at 13:31, Steven Scholz wrote:
> >
> >>The BK linuxppc_2_4_devel tree has another problem as well:
> >>
> >>drivers/ide/idedriver.o: In function `probe_hwif':
> >>drivers/ide/idedriver.o(.text+0x11a30): undefined reference to
> >>`wait_hwif_ready'
> >>drivers/ide/idedriver.o(.text+0x11a30): relocation truncated to fit:
> >>R_PPC_REL24
> >>wait_hwif_ready
> >>
> >>ide-probe.c contains a call for wait_hwif_ready(), which is not defined.
> >>This function exisists in the vanilla source though!
> >>
> >>I supposed something went wrong while merging/syncing the IDE changes
> >>from the
> >>official tree...
> >
> >Change 'wait_hwif_ready' by 'ide_wait_hwif_ready' in both ide-probe.c
> >and ide.c
> Ok. This obviously fixes it.
> I just noticed that I might have used the wrong source tree.
>
> So which is the BK tree to use:
>
> linuxppc_2_4_devel or linuxppc-2.4 ???

It depends on where what you want to use exists.  If something is in
_devel and not in linuxppc-2.4, patches to move features over one at a
time would be happily reviewed.

--
Tom Rini
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/

** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/





More information about the Linuxppc-embedded mailing list