Kernel Preemption patch

[Eugene Surovegin]

At 07:56 AM 2/24/2003, brian.auld at adic.com wrote:
>However, I noticed that your 'preempt_enable' at the bottom of the exerp has
>been changed from 'preempt_enable' as in the RML patch, to
>'preempt_enable_no_reshed'. What's the reason for this inconsistency?


Well, as I said I don't use RML patch. This code is from MVL.
Frankly, I don't think that this particular change is very important (maybe
it is :).
I didn't notice any difference between these two versions.

It's "if !defined(CONFIG_4xx) || defined(CONFIG_440)" which is more
important :)

Eugene


** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/