Lost+Found directory (was: self image)
ARIBAUD Albert
a.aribaud at giat-industries.fr
Thu Dec 11 20:39:39 EST 2003
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > How come the lost+found directory is large, or even has a
> > single entry to begin with? I thought it was used by fsck
> > to collect file data lost due to file system corruption
> > over time; so in a freshly built embedded image, there
> > shouldn't be any of that. Did I miss something?
>
> When the filesystem is created (by mke2fs) special care is taken to
> create a big directory that allows for many entries to be reconnected
> without need to grow the directory which could be dangerous on an
> already corrupted filesystem. Have a look:
>
> [...]
>
> to "blow up" the lost+found/ directory to allow for a sufficiently
> large number of directory entries. Today mke2fs does this
> automagically (and people forget why it needs to be done).
Count me out of there: I didn't have the faintest idea about it to
begin with, let alone forget that idea. :)
However, I was dumb not to think of risking corruption while fsck-ing
the filesystem. :)
Thank you wolfgang for your explanation!
Albert.
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
More information about the Linuxppc-embedded
mailing list