[PATCH] arch/ppc/8xx_io/enet.c, version 2
Joakim Tjernlund
joakim.tjernlund at lumentis.se
Fri Oct 25 01:46:45 EST 2002
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 04:23:31PM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
>
> > This is the second version of my patch that removes the expensive memcpy of
> > received
> > ethernet frames in interrupt context.
> >
> > I have 1 report(from Ricardo Scop) of 20% increase in packets/second, packet
> > size 1500 when
> > applied to 8260 FEC(needs to be applied manually). But min packet size
> > decreased with 10 %.
> > This version should fix the 10% decrease case.
> >
> > This patch could be adapted 8xx_io/fec.c and 8260_io/enet.c and
> > 8260/fcc_enet.c with little effort.
> >
> > Better fix a bug in set_multicast_list(), move the dmi list forward when
> > walking it(dmi = dmi->next;)
> >
> > New stuff:
> > - Configrable: copy small packets or pass them directly, see
> > COPY_SMALL_FRAMES in code.
> > - Collision reporting fix form Thomas Lange.
> > - Don't pass receive frames which has error upwards.
> > - Report RX_OV errors as fifo errors, not crc errors.
> >
> > Please test and report any problems and performace improvements.
>
> All of this sounds good, but can you please break this one patch up into
> seperate logical patches?
I rather not.
The logical pices in this patch are:
1) remove the expensive memcpy.
- This is the main part of the patch.
2) dmi->next fix, which is a one liner.
Don't pass receive frames which has error upwards.
- Trival stuff.
3) Collision reporting fix form Thomas Lange.
Report RX_OV errors as fifo errors, not crc errors.
- These are just minor accounting fixes.
So I don't think it's worth the effort. Let's just wait a few days and see
if it was success or not.
Folks, please report you findings to the list.
Jocke
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
More information about the Linuxppc-embedded
mailing list