[PATCH] arch/ppc/8xx_io/enet.c
Joakim Tjernlund
joakim.tjernlund at lumentis.se
Thu Oct 24 17:14:13 EST 2002
> > >
> > > Comments? Anyone care to do some benchmarking?
> >
> > No comments so far, no one interested in this?
> I'm interested! Indeed, I adapted and tested your patch in a 8260 FCC fast
> ethernet driver and it worked fine I had a 20% increase in routing
> throughput with the patch installed!
Cool!
>
> The bug fix in set_multicast_list worked too. But, since there's a continue
> clause inside the for command in this routine, I would suggest that the
> (dmi=dmi->next) command go inside the for increment clause, instead of the
> place you've put it; that is:
> for (...;...; i++, dmi = dmi->next) {...}
Yes thats better, thanks.
> >
> > A question, why do enet.c pass bad frames to netif_rx? Only late collisions
> > are disregarded, the rest is passed on.
> IMHO, this is another bug...
me too.
Jocke
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
More information about the Linuxppc-embedded
mailing list