Development tools version

[Neil Horman]

Really!  Is there a patch available or are the problems persistent?  I ask
because we have had interesting behavior differences on occasion between
stripped and unstripped versions of some software we are working on.  Thanks!
Neil :)


Magnus Damm wrote:
>
> FYI,
>
> strip in binutils-2.11.2 has problems...
> Not very important maybe, but annoying.
>
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/bug-binutils/2001-q3/msg00108.html
>
> / magnus
>
> Neil Horman wrote:
> >
> > Yes, binutils 2.11.2.  Sorry about my fat fingers... :)
> >         Say....Speaking of those memory faults.  I never got around to researching
> > them.  Can you or anyone else provide general notes on exactly what those
> > patches fix?  I'd certainly appreciate it, as I always wanted to track those
> > down, but never quite found the time.  Thanks!
> >
> > Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >I think that the Hard Hat tools will probably be the easiest for you to get up
> > > >and running with.  They have probably been the most throughly debugged for the
> > > >8xx.   Although if your looking to put together your own tools for the 860
> > > >series, we here have built the following, with a reasonably good deal of
> > > >success.  See the notes for details:
> > > >
> > > >Binutils:
> > > >       2.1.2 - no problems at all.  Download and build them for powerpc-linux and away
> > > >you go
> > > >
> > > >GCC:
> > > >       2.95.3 - again no real problems.
> > > >
> > > >GLIBC:
> > > >       2.2.4 - relatively easy.  Some issues with memory faults on occasion, which I
> > > >have not yet traked down.
> > > >
> > > >GDB:
> > > >       5.1.1 - no problems
> > > >
> > > >General notes:
> > > >       I've personally been following the embedded cross-gcc mini howto available on
> > > >penguinppc.com and I've been more or less happy with the results.  hope that
> > > >helps!
> > > >
> > > Thanks Neil.
> > >
> > > I've been able to succesfully use the Hard Hat binaries (actually that's
> > > so simple that I wouldn't have dared asking questions in this mailing
> > > list if I hadn't :-), but I'd like to recompile from the sources, in
> > > order not to depend on a binary release, and also to be able to modify
> > > the tools if needed.
> > >
> > > I tried to compile the tools from the sources without patching them a
> > > few months ago, and experienced memory faults and a lot of other
> > > problems with dynamically linked executables (is that a known issue ?).
> > >
> > > Recompiling from the SRPMS shouldn't be a hard job, so that's what I'll
> > > try. All the patches are supposed to be included in there...
> > >
> > > Just to make sure, did you mean binutils 2.11.2 ?
> > >
> > > Laurent Pinchart
> >
>

** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/