board specific defines in commproc.h !?!?
John Traill
john.traill at motorola.com
Sat Jun 22 00:18:04 EST 2002
Everyone/Anyone,
Does this mean linuxppc_2_4_devel will disappear leaving a 2.4 stable tree and a 2.5 devel ?
Paul Mackerras wrote:
> Steven Scholz writes:
>
>
>>I am not quite sure about the policies now. Could you please explain:
>>
>>linuxppc_2_4 is a stable tree
>>linuxppc_2_4_devel is a devel tree
>>linuxppc_2_5 is a devel tree
>>
>>Is that right?
>
>
> 2_4_devel is stabilizing. Once 2.4.19 comes out the plan is to
> restructure the linuxppc_2_4 tree along the lines of the 2_4_devel
> tree and start moving the stuff from 2_4_devel into 2_4 and submit it
> to Marcelo.
>
> With 2.5, I am hoping to be able to keep Linus' tree in closer sync
> with our linuxppc-2.5 tree than we managed in the past with the 2_4
> trees.
>
> Paul.
>
--
Regards, John
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
More information about the Linuxppc-embedded
mailing list