Support for Arctic platform (405LP based)
Tom Rini
trini at kernel.crashing.org
Tue Dec 17 02:02:48 EST 2002
On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 10:43:27AM +1100, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> Cort Dougan writes:
>
> > How about killing the _2_4_devel tree? When I created it I want it to be a
> > playground for stabilizing then moving things over to 2_4 failry quickly.
> > It seems to have become the defacto "want board X, you better use
> > _2_4_devel" tree.
>
> Now that Marcelo is using BK, what I would really like to do is to
> kill both the linuxppc_2_4 and linuxppc_2_4_devel trees and move to a
> tree that is a child of Marcelo's linux-2.4 tree.
... but old history? :)
[snip]
> ... There is no particular reason that I can see why the 8xx
> stuff in 2_4_devel shouldn't go to Marcelo for 2.4.21.
I'll try and get to that too, once finals are over :)
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
More information about the Linuxppc-embedded
mailing list