Status on 405GP i2c driver
akuster at pacbell.net
Thu Apr 25 04:23:44 EST 2002
andrew may wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 07:47:33AM -0700, Matt Porter wrote:
>>It's not a good idea to merge the i2c-2.6.3 support into 2_4_devel.
> It seemed that Armins patch to the i2c list was against 2.6.3 so I deciede
> to merge that in before I merged in Armin's patch. I started doing the merge
> before you added in the files so that made things interesting. Unless you
> think 2.6.3 has some new bugs I see no reason to back out the changes in
> my tree.
Yes the patch sent to the i2c mailing list was against 2.6.3 since thats
their latest version. The *.c & *.h files should be the same in both trees
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
More information about the Linuxppc-embedded