linuxppc_2_5 source tree (and others)

Cort Dougan cort at fsmlabs.com
Fri May 11 05:57:42 EST 2001


You should lose the chip from your shoulder if you want assistance.  _2_5
was never listed that way, it was an internal tree only.

} I nearly fell into the trap. Just recently, 2_5 was listed as
} being where the latest development happens. It certainly looked
} that way too, with support for more boards than 2_4 had.
} Until just this morning, I was thinking I ought to use 2_5!

No-one should have used it and the people telling you that you should have
used it shouldn't have done that.

Go to www.fsmlabs.com/linuxppcbk.html and you'll find info on how to ftp,
rsync and bk the latest Linux/PPC kernels.  You'll also find pointers to
ftp.kernel.org for the latest patches against the Linus tree.

} So now you are saying I should have used the 2_5 tree?????
} Wasn't I supposed to know (by psychic methods) that the 2_5
} tree is 'dead' now?

The list has announcements about changes in the tree status, discussions
about moving the trees, merging them, developing new code and merging with
Linus.  It's a list for those who want to use those trees in any way - lots
of useful information.

} I figured that would be a list for automated check-in reports
} generated by the BitKeeper software.

Get on the list and you won't be caught unaware.  The _2_5 tree was never a
"for outside use" tree.  Others were misinforming people, I know.  That was
unfortuante but the _2_4_devel tree and the _2_4 trees are both public and
will not be "dead ends".  All changes that Linus will accept (not a simple
job) do find their way to Linus eventually.

} So anyway, we now have a 2_4_devel tree to wonder about.
} Might somebody suddenly decide to delete this tree too?
} Will changes get back to Linus, or is this a dead-end too?

Thanks for letting us know how the world works.  Much appreciated.

} Having separate trees also defeats the purpose of revision control.
} One is supposed to use branches (or whatever BitKeeper calls them)
} for stable, release, development, etc.

** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/






More information about the Linuxppc-embedded mailing list