Possible bug in serial.c?

[mod+linuxppc-embedded at std.com]

>Since 'i' is an index into the rs_table[], shouldn't this be:
>
>        if (i >= NR_PORTS)
>                return(-ENOENT);


Speaking of rs_table[] and such, I'd be grateful for a
clear explanation of the async_struct and serial_state
structs - what are each intended for?


** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/