Another useful piece of code lost

Dan Malek dan at netx4.com
Thu May 18 13:05:04 EST 2000


Pavel Roskin wrote:

> Strictly speaking, this is wrong because this code assumes that all PPC
> machines, even PowerMac's use PCMCIA.

Of course it's wrong.  That was done specifically for your custom
embedded hardware.  There wasn't any mechanism in that code base to
ack the ATA interrupt if it didn't come from known IDE hatdware.

> The MontaVista kernels don't include anything like that. This is one of
> the reasons why they don't support ATA Flash on RPX/Lite.

That work was done for you under contract on the RPX-Lite.  If you wish
to give this away, go ahead.  My intention is to use newer IDE abstractions
or Magnus' real PCMCIA instead of this unique solution for you.


	-- Dan

** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/





More information about the Linuxppc-embedded mailing list