A stable linux 2.2.xx for sandpoint-8240 anywhere?
Dan Malek
dan at mvista.com
Sat Dec 30 08:52:30 EST 2000
Ron Bianco wrote:
> There are problems as this port was based on an experimental and unstable
> kernel.
> There are patches (tons) that fix some of the problems we've been seeing,
Really? Although not suitable for a product, there shouldn't be "tons"
of patches required to make it useful in a development environment.
There may be patches required to work around the different revisions
of the Sandpoint hardware.
> We're facing a deadline and must concentrate on a custom driver for now.
That is where all of the resources seem to be going right now, to
custom hardware. The 8240 is just a 603 with 106/107 OpenPIC PCI
bridge. The Sandpoint is what required all of the code changes. If
your hardware is like a Sandpoint, then there are still changes
required to suit your needs. Most people aren't building Sandpoint-like
hardware that I know about.
> Eventually we'll make our patches for 8240 available.
Do it quickly, as there will soon be 824x updates in the 2.4 kernel.
-- Dan
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
More information about the Linuxppc-embedded
mailing list