[PATCH v2 09/13] selftests/mm: skip uffd-wp-mremap if UFFD write-protect is unsupported

[Sayali Patil]

On 25/03/26 05:26, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Mar 2026 19:56:01 +0530 Sayali Patil <sayalip at linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>>> Because right now it reads as if it would be returning a bool.
>>>
>>> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand (Arm) <david at kernel.org>
>>>
>> Thanks for the review. I'll rename it to
>> "check_uffd_wp_feature_supported()" in the next version.
> There was no next version.  I added this:
>
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-wp-mremap.c~selftests-mm-skip-uffd-wp-mremap-if-uffd-write-protect-is-unsupported-fix
> +++ a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-wp-mremap.c
> @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ static size_t thpsizes[20];
>   static int nr_hugetlbsizes;
>   static size_t hugetlbsizes[10];
>   
> -static void uffd_wp_feature_supported(void)
> +static void check_uffd_wp_feature_supported(void)
>   {
>   	uint64_t features;
>   
> @@ -347,7 +347,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
>   	struct thp_settings settings;
>   	int i, j, plan = 0;
>   
> -	uffd_wp_feature_supported();
> +	check_uffd_wp_feature_supported();
>   
>   	pagesize = getpagesize();
>   	nr_thpsizes = detect_thp_sizes(thpsizes, ARRAY_SIZE(thpsizes));
> _
>
Hi Andrew,
I have some updates to [PATCH v2 04/13] selftests/mm: fix cgroup task 
placement and tolerance in hugetlb_reparenting_test.sh, as Venkat 
reported failures with the current version.

Should I send a v3 of the full series, or just a fixup patch for 
hugetlb_reparenting_test.sh? Also, if you prefer a v3, should I include 
above fix for 
selftests-mm-skip-uffd-wp-mremap-if-uffd-write-protect-is-unsupported as 
well?

Thanks,
Sayali