[PATCH v3 2/3] mm: replace vma_start_write() with vma_start_write_killable()
Suren Baghdasaryan
surenb at google.com
Fri Mar 6 02:55:59 AEDT 2026
On Wed, Mar 4, 2026 at 11:00 AM Matthew Wilcox <willy at infradead.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 04, 2026 at 04:53:27PM +0000, Lorenzo Stoakes (Oracle) wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 04, 2026 at 03:24:05AM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > We could literally return any error code -- it never makes it to
> > > userspace. I forget where it is, but if you follow the syscall
> > > return to user path, a dying task never makes it to running a single
> > > instruction.
> >
> > Thanks for that Matthew, that makes life easier then.
> >
> > We can probably replace some of the more horrid if (err == -EINTR) stuff with
> > fatal_signal_pending(current) to be clearer as a result.
>
> Umm. Be careful? fatal_signal_pending() may become true at a later
> point, so you may have acquired the lock _and_ fatal_signal_pending()
> can be true. I'd need to audit a patch to be sure that it's a
> reasonable replacement.
Good point. I'll evaluate each case for this potential.
Thanks!
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list