[PATCH 1/2] ima: efi: Drop unnecessary check for CONFIG_MODULE_SIG/CONFIG_KEXEC_SIG

Mimi Zohar zohar at linux.ibm.com
Sat Feb 28 05:21:57 AEDT 2026


On Thu, 2026-02-26 at 08:20 +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> When configuration settings are disabled the guarded functions are
> defined as empty stubs, so the check is unnecessary.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux at weissschuh.net>
> Reviewed-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar at linux.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin at atomlin.com>
> Reviewed-by: Nicolas Schier <nsc at kernel.org>
> ---
>  security/integrity/ima/ima_efi.c | 6 ++----
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_efi.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_efi.c
> index 138029bfcce1..a35dd166ad47 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_efi.c
> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_efi.c
> @@ -68,10 +68,8 @@ static const char * const sb_arch_rules[] = {
>  const char * const *arch_get_ima_policy(void)
>  {
>  	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IMA_ARCH_POLICY) && arch_ima_get_secureboot()) {
> -		if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MODULE_SIG))
> -			set_module_sig_enforced();
> -		if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KEXEC_SIG))
> -			set_kexec_sig_enforced();
> +		set_module_sig_enforced();
> +		set_kexec_sig_enforced();
>  		return sb_arch_rules;
>  	}
>  	return NULL;

Thanks, Thomas.

With commit 63e8a44395a4 ("integrity: Make arch_ima_get_secureboot integrity-
wide"), there was a merge conflict.  After fixing the merge conflict, your
patches are now queued in next-integrity.

Mimi


More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list