[RFC v1 1/2] drivers/vfio_pci_core: Change PXD_ORDER check from switch case to if/else block
Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
chleroy at kernel.org
Fri Feb 27 17:42:03 AEDT 2026
Le 27/02/2026 à 07:16, Ritesh Harjani (IBM) a écrit :
> Architectures like PowerPC uses runtime defined values for
> PMD_ORDER/PUD_ORDER. This is because it can use either RADIX or HASH MMU
> at runtime using kernel cmdline. So the pXd_index_size is not known at
> compile time. Without this fix, when we add huge pfn support on powerpc
> in the next patch, vfio_pci_core driver compilation can fail with the
> following errors.
>
> CC [M] drivers/vfio/vfio_main.o
> CC [M] drivers/vfio/group.o
> CC [M] drivers/vfio/container.o
> CC [M] drivers/vfio/virqfd.o
> CC [M] drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_spapr_tce.o
> CC [M] drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.o
> CC [M] drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_intrs.o
> CC [M] drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_rdwr.o
> CC [M] drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.o
> CC [M] drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.o
> AR kernel/built-in.a
> ../drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c: In function ‘vfio_pci_vmf_insert_pfn’:
> ../drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c:1678:9: error: case label does not reduce to an integer constant
> 1678 | case PMD_ORDER:
> | ^~~~
> ../drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c:1682:9: error: case label does not reduce to an integer constant
> 1682 | case PUD_ORDER:
> | ^~~~
> make[6]: *** [../scripts/Makefile.build:289: drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.o] Error 1
> make[6]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> make[5]: *** [../scripts/Makefile.build:546: drivers/vfio/pci] Error 2
> make[5]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> make[4]: *** [../scripts/Makefile.build:546: drivers/vfio] Error 2
> make[3]: *** [../scripts/Makefile.build:546: drivers] Error 2
>
> Fixes: f9e54c3a2f5b7 ("vfio/pci: implement huge_fault support")
> Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list at gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c | 15 +++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c
> index d43745fe4c84..5395a6f30904 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c
> @@ -1670,21 +1670,20 @@ vm_fault_t vfio_pci_vmf_insert_pfn(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev,
> if (vdev->pm_runtime_engaged || !__vfio_pci_memory_enabled(vdev))
> return VM_FAULT_SIGBUS;
>
> - switch (order) {
> - case 0:
> + if (order == 0) {
> return vmf_insert_pfn(vmf->vma, vmf->address, pfn);
> + }
Those braces are unneeded as all legs of the if/else are single lines
> #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_SUPPORTS_PMD_PFNMAP
ifdef could be replaced by IS_ENABLED() because PxD_ORDER and
vmf_insert_pfn_xxx() are declared all the time
> - case PMD_ORDER:
> + else if (order == PMD_ORDER) {
'else' is not needed because every 'if' leads to a return statement
> return vmf_insert_pfn_pmd(vmf, pfn, false);
> + }
> #endif
> #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_SUPPORTS_PUD_PFNMAP
> - case PUD_ORDER:
> + else if (order == PUD_ORDER) {
> return vmf_insert_pfn_pud(vmf, pfn, false);
> - break;
> + }
> #endif
> - default:
> - return VM_FAULT_FALLBACK;
> - }
> + return VM_FAULT_FALLBACK;
So at the end we should get something like:
if (!order)
return vmf_insert_pfn(vmf->vma, vmf->address, pfn);
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_SUPPORTS_PMD_PFNMAP) && order == PMD_ORDER)
return vmf_insert_pfn_pmd(vmf, pfn, false);
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_SUPPORTS_PUD_PFNMAP) && order == PMD_ORDER)
return vmf_insert_pfn_pud(vmf, pfn, false);
return VM_FAULT_FALLBACK;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_pci_vmf_insert_pfn);
>
> --
> 2.53.0
>
>
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list