[PATCH] soc: fsl: qbman: fix race condition in qman_destroy_fq
Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
chleroy at kernel.org
Fri Feb 6 18:16:00 AEDT 2026
Hi,
Le 02/02/2026 à 13:54, Richard GENOUD a écrit :
> Le 23/12/2025 à 08:25, Richard Genoud a écrit :
>> When QMAN_FQ_FLAG_DYNAMIC_FQID is set, there's a race condition between
>> fq_table[fq->idx] state and freeing/allocating from the pool and
>> WARN_ON(fq_table[fq->idx]) in qman_create_fq() gets triggered.
>>
>> Indeed, we can have:
>> Thread A Thread B
>> qman_destroy_fq() qman_create_fq()
>> qman_release_fqid()
>> qman_shutdown_fq()
>> gen_pool_free()
>> -- At this point, the fqid is available again --
>> qman_alloc_fqid()
>> -- so, we can get the just-freed fqid in thread B --
>> fq->fqid = fqid;
>> fq->idx = fqid * 2;
>> WARN_ON(fq_table[fq->idx]);
>> fq_table[fq->idx] = fq;
>> fq_table[fq->idx] = NULL;
>>
>> And adding some logs between qman_release_fqid() and
>> fq_table[fq->idx] = NULL makes the WARN_ON() trigger a lot more.
>>
>> To prevent that, ensure that fq_table[fq->idx] is set to NULL before
>> gen_pool_free() is called by using smp_wmb().
>>
>
> Tested on a LS1046A based board.
> With this patch, the warning is not triggered anymore.
>
> Tested-by: CHAMPSEIX Thomas <thomas.champseix at alstomgroup.com>
This fix is now in linux-next. If everything goes well I will send a
pull request for this fix in rc2 or rc3.
>
>> Fixes: c535e923bb97 ("soc/fsl: Introduce DPAA 1.x QMan device driver")
>> Signed-off-by: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud at bootlin.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/soc/fsl/qbman/qman.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> NB: I'm not 100% sure of the need of a barrier here, since even without
>> it, the WARN_ON() wasn't triggered any more.
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/fsl/qbman/qman.c b/drivers/soc/fsl/qbman/qman.c
>> index 6b392b3ad4b1..39a3e7aab6ff 100644
>> --- a/drivers/soc/fsl/qbman/qman.c
>> +++ b/drivers/soc/fsl/qbman/qman.c
>> @@ -1827,6 +1827,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(qman_create_fq);
>> void qman_destroy_fq(struct qman_fq *fq)
>> {
>> + int leaked;
>> +
>> /*
>> * We don't need to lock the FQ as it is a pre-condition that
>> the FQ be
>> * quiesced. Instead, run some checks.
>> @@ -1834,11 +1836,29 @@ void qman_destroy_fq(struct qman_fq *fq)
>> switch (fq->state) {
>> case qman_fq_state_parked:
>> case qman_fq_state_oos:
>> - if (fq_isset(fq, QMAN_FQ_FLAG_DYNAMIC_FQID))
>> - qman_release_fqid(fq->fqid);
>> + /*
>> + * There's a race condition here on releasing the fqid,
>> + * setting the fq_table to NULL, and freeing the fqid.
>> + * To prevent it, this order should be respected:
>> + */
>> + if (fq_isset(fq, QMAN_FQ_FLAG_DYNAMIC_FQID)) {
>> + leaked = qman_shutdown_fq(fq->fqid);
>> + if (leaked)
>> + pr_debug("FQID %d leaked\n", fq->fqid);
>> + }
>> DPAA_ASSERT(fq_table[fq->idx]);
>> fq_table[fq->idx] = NULL;
>> +
>> + if (fq_isset(fq, QMAN_FQ_FLAG_DYNAMIC_FQID) && !leaked) {
>> + /*
>> + * fq_table[fq->idx] should be set to null before
>> + * freeing fq->fqid otherwise it could by allocated by
>> + * qman_alloc_fqid() while still being !NULL
>> + */
>> + smp_wmb();
>> + gen_pool_free(qm_fqalloc, fq->fqid | DPAA_GENALLOC_OFF, 1);
>> + }
>> return;
>> default:
>> break;
>>
>> base-commit: 9448598b22c50c8a5bb77a9103e2d49f134c9578
>
>
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list