[Linaro-mm-sig] Re: [PATCH V13 5/7] rust: Make __udivdi3() and __umoddi3() panic

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Fri, Apr 24, 2026, at 11:43, Link Mauve wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2026 at 10:14:25AM +0100, David Laight wrote:
>> On Fri, 24 Apr 2026 11:17:40 +0530
>> "Mukesh Kumar Chaurasiya (IBM)" <mkchauras at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> > From: Link Mauve <linkmauve at linkmauve.fr>
>> > 
>> > The core crate currently depends on these two functions for i64/u64/
>> > i128/u128/core::time::Duration formatting, but we shouldn’t use that in
>> > the kernel so let’s panic if they are ever called.
>> 
>> Ugg.
>> Surely you can make it a link-time failure?
>> Or change the underlying code to avoid the divide.
>
> This is currently a link-time failure, which means if any of the core
> crate or drm_panic_qr are linked in, the kernel will fail to link.
>
> And since we rely on core, that means no kernel can be built on PowerPC
> without this patch.
>
> A possible solution would be to change the core crate to not divide
> u64s, but the last time I tried to do that I couldn’t quite figure out
> how to do formatting without it, maybe I will just open an issue against
> Rust.

I think you just need to rewrite the patch description, it appears
that everyone misunderstands what you are doing in the patch:

Like on arm32, normal kernel code will continue to cause
a link failure the same way in Rust as it does in C, and your
patch does not change that. When you (or Link Mauve) "let's panic",
I assume this is was just a mistake in summarizing the logic
that turns the unreachable code from the Rust core crate
into a runtime assertion since it would be impossible to link
the kernel otherwise.

Silently turning a 64-bit division into a panic() for normal
code would of course be unacceptable, but that's not what
you are doing here.

    Arnd