[PATCH net v2] ibmveth: Disable GSO for packets with small MSS

[Jakub Kicinski]

This is an AI-generated review of your patch. The human sending this
email has considered the AI review valid, or at least plausible.
---
ibmveth: Disable GSO for packets with small MSS

This commit adds an ndo_features_check callback to the ibmveth driver to
disable segmentation offload when the MSS is less than 224 bytes. This
prevents physical adapters in SEA configurations from freezing when given
small MSS packets.

> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmveth.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmveth.c
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmveth.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmveth.c

[ ... ]

> @@ -1756,6 +1756,25 @@ static int ibmveth_set_mac_addr(struct net_device *dev, void *p)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static netdev_features_t ibmveth_features_check(struct sk_buff *skb,
> +						struct net_device *dev,
> +						netdev_features_t features)
> +{
> +	/* Some physical adapters do not support segmentation offload with
> +	 * MSS < 224. Disable GSO for such packets to avoid adapter freeze.
> +	 */
> +	if (skb_is_gso(skb)) {

The commit message mentions this matches the ibmvnic hardware errata from
commit f10b09ef687f. That commit disabled GSO for both gso_size < 224 and
gso_segs == 1.

By omitting the check for skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_segs == 1, could a
single-segment GSO packet still cause the adapter to freeze?

> +		if (skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_size < IBMVETH_MIN_LSO_MSS) {
> +			netdev_warn_once(dev,
> +					 "MSS %u too small for LSO, disabling GSO\n",
> +					 skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_size);
> +			features &= ~NETIF_F_GSO_MASK;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	return features;

When implementing a custom ndo_features_check callback, netif_skb_features()
will bypass the standard dflt_features_check() function. Does this mean
vlan_features_check() is no longer called for this driver?

If vlan_features_check() is skipped, multi-tagged (QinQ) VLAN packets
might retain GSO and protocol-specific checksum offloads that the hardware
parser cannot handle.

Should this return vlan_features_check(skb, features) instead?

> +}
-- 
pw-bot: cr