[PATCH v2 2/7] mm: introduce local state for lazy_mmu sections
David Hildenbrand
david at redhat.com
Fri Sep 12 18:55:50 AEST 2025
> I also wondered about that. I think the safest is to make them
> respectively arch_leave() and arch_enter() - the flushing entailed by
> arch_leave() might not be required, but it is safer. Additionally,
> powerpc/sparc disable preemption while in lazy_mmu, so it seems like a
> good idea to re-enable it while paused (by calling arch_leave()).
Great, looking forward to seeing this all getting cleaned up and done
properly for good.
--
Cheers
David / dhildenb
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list