[PATCH v5 0/6] cpufreq: use __free() for all cpufreq_cpu_get() references

Zihuan Zhang zhangzihuan at kylinos.cn
Mon Sep 8 19:12:37 AEST 2025


在 2025/9/6 01:49, Borislav Petkov 写道:
> On Fri, Sep 05, 2025 at 09:24:07PM +0800, Zihuan Zhang wrote:
>> This patchset converts all remaining cpufreq users to rely on the
>> __free(put_cpufreq_policy) annotation for policy references, instead of
>> calling cpufreq_cpu_put() manually.
> Sep 01 Zihuan Zhang ( :8.6K|) [PATCH v3 00/12] cpufreq: use __free() for all cpufreq_cpu_get() references
> Sep 03 Zihuan Zhang ( :  65|) [PATCH v4 00/10] cpufreq: use __free() for all cpufreq_cpu_get() references
> Sep 05 Zihuan Zhang ( :8.3K|) [PATCH v5 0/6] cpufreq: use __free() for all cpufreq_cpu_get() references
>
> Please stop the spamming. While waiting, go read how this kernel process thing
> works:
>
> From: Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst
>
> Don't get discouraged - or impatient
> ------------------------------------
>
> After you have submitted your change, be patient and wait.  Reviewers are
> busy people and may not get to your patch right away.
>
> Once upon a time, patches used to disappear into the void without comment,
> but the development process works more smoothly than that now.  You should
> receive comments within a week or so; if that does not happen, make sure
> that you have sent your patches to the right place.  Wait for a minimum of
> one week before resubmitting or pinging reviewers - possibly longer during
> busy times like merge windows.
Sorry for the noise. I’ll split the patchset and avoid CC’ing 
unnecessary people in the future.

Thanks for the reminder!


More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list