[PATCH v3 12/12] PM: EM: Use scope-based cleanup helper

[Zihuan Zhang]

> You are not improving the source code here. This is not how to use
>  __free() and you clearly do not understand the source code.

Sorry for the problem, policy should be assigned after cpumask_test_cpu().

I actually realized earlier that __free() only frees at the end of the variable’s lifetime. 
I had suggested using a braced macro in cpufreq.h to allow immediate release after use, 
but I understand the maintainer’s advice to “keep it simple” and will follow that.

> What's more, you did not use standard tools which would tell you this is
> buggy and wrong.

Could you please let me know which standard tools you recommend for detecting such issues? 

I’d like to use them to avoid similar mistakes in the future.

> Don't introduce cleanup.h if you do not understand how it works.

Should I drop this patch?