[PATCH 4/6 v6] acpi/ghes: Add helper for CXL protocol errors checks
Jonathan Cameron
jonathan.cameron at huawei.com
Wed Oct 29 01:54:15 AEDT 2025
On Thu, 23 Oct 2025 14:25:39 +0200
"Fabio M. De Francesco" <fabio.m.de.francesco at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> Move the CPER CXL protocol errors validity out of
validity check
> cxl_cper_post_prot_err() to cxl_cper_sec_prot_err_valid() and limit the
to new cxl_cper_sec_prot_err_valid()
as otherwise it sounds like it already exists.
> serial number check only to CXL agents that are CXL devices (UEFI v2.10,
> Appendix N.2.13).
Perhaps a little more here on why. I assume because you are going to have
a second user for it, but good to say that. Also serves to justify the
export.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fabio M. De Francesco <fabio.m.de.francesco at linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> include/cxl/event.h | 10 ++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
> index d6fe5f020e96..e69ae864f43d 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
> @@ -706,30 +706,42 @@ static DEFINE_KFIFO(cxl_cper_prot_err_fifo, struct cxl_cper_prot_err_work_data,
> static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(cxl_cper_prot_err_work_lock);
> struct work_struct *cxl_cper_prot_err_work;
>
> -static void cxl_cper_post_prot_err(struct cxl_cper_sec_prot_err *prot_err,
> - int severity)
> +int cxl_cper_sec_prot_err_valid(struct cxl_cper_sec_prot_err *prot_err)
Useful to return an error number? Or would a bool be better given it is either
valid or not?
Otherwise looks good to me,
Jonathan
> {
> - struct cxl_cper_prot_err_work_data wd;
> - u8 *dvsec_start, *cap_start;
> -
> if (!(prot_err->valid_bits & PROT_ERR_VALID_AGENT_ADDRESS)) {
> pr_err_ratelimited("CXL CPER invalid agent type\n");
> - return;
> + return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> if (!(prot_err->valid_bits & PROT_ERR_VALID_ERROR_LOG)) {
> pr_err_ratelimited("CXL CPER invalid protocol error log\n");
> - return;
> + return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> if (prot_err->err_len != sizeof(struct cxl_ras_capability_regs)) {
> pr_err_ratelimited("CXL CPER invalid RAS Cap size (%u)\n",
> prot_err->err_len);
> - return;
> + return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> - if (!(prot_err->valid_bits & PROT_ERR_VALID_SERIAL_NUMBER))
> - pr_warn(FW_WARN "CXL CPER no device serial number\n");
> + if ((prot_err->agent_type == RCD || prot_err->agent_type == DEVICE ||
> + prot_err->agent_type == LD || prot_err->agent_type == FMLD) &&
> + !(prot_err->valid_bits & PROT_ERR_VALID_SERIAL_NUMBER))
> + pr_warn_ratelimited(FW_WARN
> + "CXL CPER no device serial number\n");
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cxl_cper_sec_prot_err_valid);
> +
> +static void cxl_cper_post_prot_err(struct cxl_cper_sec_prot_err *prot_err,
> + int severity)
> +{
> + struct cxl_cper_prot_err_work_data wd;
> + u8 *dvsec_start, *cap_start;
> +
> + if (cxl_cper_sec_prot_err_valid(prot_err))
> + return;
>
> guard(spinlock_irqsave)(&cxl_cper_prot_err_work_lock);
>
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list