[PATCH v3 12/13] mm: bail out of lazy_mmu_mode_* in interrupt context

[David Hildenbrand]

On 15.10.25 10:27, Kevin Brodsky wrote:
> The lazy MMU mode cannot be used in interrupt context. This is
> documented in <linux/pgtable.h>, but isn't consistently handled
> across architectures.
> 
> arm64 ensures that calls to lazy_mmu_mode_* have no effect in
> interrupt context, because such calls do occur in certain
> configurations - see commit b81c688426a9 ("arm64/mm: Disable barrier
> batching in interrupt contexts"). Other architectures do not check
> this situation, most likely because it hasn't occurred so far.
> 
> Both arm64 and x86/Xen also ensure that any lazy MMU optimisation is
> disabled while in interrupt mode (see queue_pte_barriers() and
> xen_get_lazy_mode() respectively).
> 
> Let's handle this in the new generic lazy_mmu layer, in the same
> fashion as arm64: bail out of lazy_mmu_mode_* if in_interrupt(), and
> have in_lazy_mmu_mode() return false to disable any optimisation.
> Also remove the arm64 handling that is now redundant; x86/Xen has
> its own internal tracking so it is left unchanged.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky at arm.com>
> ---
>   arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h | 17 +----------------
>   include/linux/pgtable.h          | 16 ++++++++++++++--
>   include/linux/sched.h            |  3 +++
>   3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
> index 944e512767db..a37f417c30be 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
> @@ -62,37 +62,22 @@ static inline void emit_pte_barriers(void)
>   
>   static inline void queue_pte_barriers(void)
>   {
> -	if (in_interrupt()) {
> -		emit_pte_barriers();
> -		return;
> -	}
> -

That took me a while. I guess this works because in_lazy_mmu_mode() == 0 
in interrupt context, so we keep calling emit_pte_barriers?


-- 
Cheers

David / dhildenb