[PATCH v4 05/12] mm: introduce CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_LAZY_MMU_MODE
Kevin Brodsky
kevin.brodsky at arm.com
Thu Nov 6 21:33:24 AEDT 2025
On 05/11/2025 04:40, Ritesh Harjani (IBM) wrote:
> Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky at arm.com> writes:
>
>> Architectures currently opt in for implementing lazy_mmu helpers by
>> defining __HAVE_ARCH_ENTER_LAZY_MMU_MODE.
>>
>> In preparation for introducing a generic lazy_mmu layer that will
>> require storage in task_struct, let's switch to a cleaner approach:
>> instead of defining a macro, select a CONFIG option.
>>
>> This patch introduces CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_LAZY_MMU_MODE and has each
>> arch select it when it implements lazy_mmu helpers.
>> __HAVE_ARCH_ENTER_LAZY_MMU_MODE is removed and <linux/pgtable.h>
>> relies on the new CONFIG instead.
>>
>> On x86, lazy_mmu helpers are only implemented if PARAVIRT_XXL is
>> selected. This creates some complications in arch/x86/boot/, because
>> a few files manually undefine PARAVIRT* options. As a result
>> <asm/paravirt.h> does not define the lazy_mmu helpers, but this
>> breaks the build as <linux/pgtable.h> only defines them if
>> !CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_LAZY_MMU_MODE. There does not seem to be a clean
>> way out of this - let's just undefine that new CONFIG too.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky at arm.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/Kconfig | 1 +
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h | 1 -
>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/tlbflush-hash.h | 2 --
>> arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig.cputype | 1 +
>> arch/sparc/Kconfig | 1 +
>> arch/sparc/include/asm/tlbflush_64.h | 2 --
>> arch/x86/Kconfig | 1 +
>> arch/x86/boot/compressed/misc.h | 1 +
>> arch/x86/boot/startup/sme.c | 1 +
>> arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h | 1 -
>> include/linux/pgtable.h | 2 +-
>> mm/Kconfig | 3 +++
>> 12 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> Maybe we can add this to ... ?
>
> Documentation/features/vm/lazy_mmu/arch-support.txt
>
> #
> # Feature name: lazy_mmu mode
> # Kconfig: ARCH_HAS_LAZY_MMU_MODE
> # description: arch supports arch_{enter|flush|leave}_lazy_mmu_mode()
> #
> -----------------------
> | arch |status|
> -----------------------
> | arm64: | ok |
> | powerpc: | ok |
> | sparc: | ok |
> | x86: | ok |
> -----------------------
That's an interesting idea but I'm not sure it really makes sense for
lazy MMU? AFAIU these arch-support.txt files are meant to help identify
which generic features an arch has support for. Lazy MMU isn't really a
feature though, in the sense that what it does is entirely defined by
the arch. This patch does introduce a generic layer, but ultimately it
remains a collection of arch hooks.
> As for this patch, the changes are mostly straight forward around the
> configs part. This looks good to me. Please feel free to add:
>
> Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list at gmail.com>
Thanks for the review!
- Kevin
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list